If the u-value is calculated in this way, the important effect of the heat storage is completely ignored. The experiment shows that a larger part of the heating energy used for room 1 has been stored by the BBS thermo wall on the warm side, and transported very slowly to the outside. And what else is not taken into account with all these experiments?
BBS thermo buildings are mostly not in the laboratory, but outdoors, in summer and winter, in the rain or sun.
We are conscious that the u-value of BBS thermo is very important for customers and interested parties. A lot of aid and support depends on this. Nevertheless, this question would be more important " ... and how much energy does a BBS thermo house actually need"? Nobody asks about the calculated consumption of a car. We all test this for ourselves almost every time we refuel, although we do not get any aid for our cars.
We are not saying that the u-value is an incorrect characteristic. We do not doubt the u- value as such. However, we realise that the u-value, the way it is normally calculated, does not give the correct information about the energy behaviour of BBS thermo. Buildings made of BBS thermo consume considerably less energy than conventional calculations show.
The people, who live in there, know already that this is true.